VolciakLens2Monster

Samantha Volciak //Monster//: Reader as Writer

//Monster // can be used as an effective guide to teach many techniques about writing. One of the most significant elements in the novel is the way it is formatted. The novel is written in two different formats that work together effectively. I learned that if a writer is going to incorporate different formats they must know when and how to use them effectively. //Monster// is formatted into movie script and journal entries. The movie script is used when interactions are taking place between characters. These instances include the trial, meetings, jail interactions, and past memories. By using movie script, Steve is able to write the dialogue as the characters actually spoke it. This is beneficial because it creates more realism; the different forms of dialogue demonstrate the cultural differences between the characters, such as the lawyers vs. the inmates. In addition, he incorporates different types of shots that work effectively to create mood and visualize the focal point. For example, point of view shots direct the reader’s attention to the speaker’s point of view, and allow them to visualize the scene through their perspective. Also close up shots are used to create a sense of intensity or fear on the mood.

Journal entries, on the other hand, are used for Steve to describe his thoughts and feelings throughout his experience. When Steve switches to journal entries, the reader gets inside of his head and experiences his fears, desires, and worries. Journal entries allow the reader to get to know the character of Steve outside of his predicament. I feel that the journal entries increased engagement in the novel that movie script could not have achieved on its own.

I also learned that it is beneficial to not reveal too much information. The writer needs to be aware of what they want the reader to definitely know and what they should interpret for themselves. In //Monster//, the reader never finds out for sure if Steve is innocent or guilty; however, the text provides multiple pieces of evidence that allow the reader to produce their own conclusion. These pieces of evidence never explicitly give away the answer; they leave room for the reader to interpret the situation as they see it. By leaving room for interpretation, the writer opens the novel up to new opportunities such as class discussions, debates, critical thinking, and journal reflecting.

If I was to compose a similar text that used a format beyond the typical paragraph form, I would consider incorporating a texting, or facebook chat format. This is due to the fact that most young adults are engaged in these forms of media every day. Considering what I learned from, //Monster//, I would remember to keep the two formats distinct, and serve a purpose a different format could not have achieved. I would also create realism by demonstrating the cultural differences between the characters through dialogue. For example, writing “U” and “lol” for online script. I would also leave certain issues open ended to spark critical thinking and discussions.